Log in

No account? Create an account
My first post spreading the anti-geek message around the world.… - The Anti-Geek Community [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
ANTI- GEEKS --- For LJ users who HATE GEEKS!!!!!!

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

[Apr. 21st, 2004|08:28 pm]
ANTI- GEEKS --- For LJ users who HATE GEEKS!!!!!!


[mood |angryangry]

My first post spreading the anti-geek message around the world. Oooh-ee.

Well, I have one (of many) stories about geeks in my life. There is a certain student, who will remain anonymous, at my school, who decided it would be fashionable or something to wear this navy-blue beret-type hat. He then proceeded to wear it for about a week. Well, this hat was perhaps the most geekiest thing I have seen, which was made worse by the fact that the person wearing is also a geek. It took a lot of mental strength to refrain from hitting him...

Damn those geeks, causing eyesores at school, and walking around like they are popular enough to be different!

[User Picture]From: sq88
2005-03-04 11:31 pm (UTC)


Yeah - so sorry for the confusion ole chap, i wasn't refering to you and it's lovely u have high self-esteem (woot) And i wasn't really refering to dude with the hat but it's more of a general statement i say when self-esteem has so obviously been kicked down a notch. Most laugh when i do - - but i supose it's one of those "you have to be there" type of things. NEwho - i'm sure he'll never wear the hat again for fear of his peers etc. but then i'm not really attached to his feelings.. Yes - many kids are cruel and it's quite disheartning, makes me sad, prolly cause i have a little brother who's excluded from all his little school mates' activities cause he's the newe kid. But yeah - - thumbs up to salad fingers, though the ending of the fifth one wasn't comfortable.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: tall_one10
2005-03-05 03:06 am (UTC)

Re: ~sigh~

Ah, je comprends. Perhaps it's something in your tone or inflection that just doesn't make it through when in written form.

Well, I'm all for a general self-esteem @$$-kicking every once in a while, even if it is my own. What goes around comes around, I suppose.

It is very unfortuate that kids are so generally mean to each other. It would be interesting to see if it's nature vs. nurture. Are we simply born with a tendancy to be mean to one another, or is it taught somehow? Of course, there have in fact been many a study towards this end, and they always conflict, so who knows where the truth lies.

Sorry to hear about your brother. I hated having to go to a new school, but I seemed to have managed decently enough. Took some time and some effort, but it all worked out in the end.

Thumbs up to Salad Fingers? Lol, not a bad pun. Salad Fingers is the greatest, in a morbid, disturbing sort of way. Especially number 5! 'Do you not like my mouth words?' :P
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: sq88
2005-03-06 01:36 am (UTC)

Re: ~sigh~

Oh, the good ole nature/nurture theory - - heard it so often in my soc class last sem, heh. Aww, but i so miss the discussions. Go benovian Chimps!(. . .or whatever those sexy chimps names were)

I would argue that it's mostly nurture for the child would be learning to adapt to it's environment's social scheme so it would follow Bandura's role model theory in first copying the parent(s) then building on that based on it's peers. (all children will be refered to as ITs HaHAHA!!!)

I also find the parents in this small town are quite clique-ish, jugmental, and into everyone's business. It seems as if the ole "familiarity breeds contempt" quote is being proved true 'cause everyone knows each other's secrets and the old decent gossip would be to spead them around, whoop!

Of course then there's other outside factors like the popular "power corupts and absolute power corupts absolutely" which is, GeNeRaLlY (NOT always) true. An interesting quip on tv was saying slavery actually (i)made(/i) the white masters bad people for it allowed them to beleive beating the slaves was an acceptable release of tension, that they (white) were superior, etc etc. But yeah, that's a whole 'nuther discussion.

Oh yeas, #5 was lovely - yet harsh in the end with the "slasher" moments. Stop scratching your tummy box. . HeHeHe. I elect you my new playmate.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: tall_one10
2005-03-07 08:36 pm (UTC)

Re: ~sigh~

Fortunately I never did take a sociology course, though the nature vs. nurture stuff certainly did seem to overflow into other courses. I'm not sure that 'sexy' is a term I'd use to describe any chimp, though. :P

I've never lived in a small community, so I only know the small-town social 'climate' from cliched books, movies, tv, stereotypes, and all those other wonderfully truthful things, though I would imagine you would get to know one another pretty well after a while. Being in a city does have its advantages. You can dissappear and it could take years for your next door neighbour to notice. I probably know half the people on my street, if that. But people are still judgmental, clique-ish and into each other's business in the city. Kids here are still nasty, irrational and quick to judge. I think that part's just natural to most people, then it's reinforced by society.

I doubt slavery 'made' the white masters bad. They had to want to own slaves, then mistreat them, to begin with. Once it became acceptable practice, yes, it did become easy to just follow along. Thus, people are sheep.

I like all the Salad Fingers. Maybe not number 3. That one was a different disturbing.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)